MalsysisalTristress Reform Engine

Justice Identity Stress Hatred · antidote: Charity

PTAESACNA

Identity Stress Dashboard

PTA, ESA and CNA activation, the Hatred index and the Charity index for each sample entity. Choose an entity to see its profile and the reforms that would move it most.

Stress map

Identity Stress map: score 0–100 for each sample entity. For the three axes and Hatred, lower is better; for Charity, higher is better.
EntityPTAESACNAHatredCharity
government · Southeast, US65.763.255.968.825.4
court · Midwest, US48.845.943.55238.8
media · National, US8250.174.581.412
corporate · West Coast, US31.82831.134.755.2

Entity profile

Example City Government E · government · Southeast, US · large · budget 3,900M USD · serves 870,000 people Fictional example

Hatred index

68.8/100

Power gained from division relative to investment in unity. Lower is better.

Charity index

25.4/100

Upstream identity security delivered relative to downstream conflict management. Higher is better.

Axis activation

61.6/100

Mean of PTA, ESA and CNA. Lower is better.

Example City Government E: PTA 65.7, ESA 63.2, CNA 55.950100PTA65.7ESA63.2CNA55.9
Identity Stress axes for Example City Government E (0–100, lower is better)
View data table
AxisExample City Government E
Political Threat Axis65.7
Economic Scarcity Axis63.2
Cultural Narrative Axis55.9

Inputs

MetricValueStress
Political polarization index 0–1007272
Bias incidents per 100k people1447
Income inequality Gini coefficient0.5174
Poverty rate % of population1947
Narrative plurality index 0–1004159
Community integration spend % of budget1.585

Stress is each input placed on a 0–100 scale, where 100 is the most stress.

Recommended reforms

Ranked by impact potential: the total score movement each reform would produce on Example City Government E by itself.

  1. 1. Pay to reduce hatred

    Impact 37.7

    Core Principle: Institutions Must Be Paid to Reduce Hatred, Not Monetize It

    Hatred −12.4 · Charity +10.4 · PTA −6.6 · ESA −3.8 · CNA −4.5

  2. 7. Pay for unity, not division

    Impact 36.6

    Realign Institutional Incentives: Pay for Unity, Not Division

    Hatred −13.8 · Charity +9 · PTA −5.3 · ESA −5.1 · CNA −3.4

  3. 4. Early anti-hatred interventions

    Impact 34.1

    Integrate Cheap, Effective Anti-Hatred Interventions Early

    Hatred −8.3 · Charity +7.5 · PTA −5.3 · ESA −6.3 · CNA −6.7

  4. 3. Upstream intervention parity

    Impact 32.2

    Reimburse Upstream Interventions at Parity with Downstream Conflict Management

    Hatred −6.9 · Charity +10.4 · PTA −5.3 · ESA −5.1 · CNA −4.5

  5. 5. Identity-secure political design

    Impact 32

    Redesign Political Systems Around Identity Security

    Hatred −8.3 · Charity +7.5 · PTA −9.2 · ESA −2.5 · CNA −4.5

Simulate the top three for Example City Government E